Matorova Mire (Matorovansuo), Northern Finland

Description

Location

Demosite Location
Demosite Location

Sketch

Demosite Location

Information about lithology/geochemistry:

Bedrock is Lapland rapakivi granite, overlain by glacial sediments and peat; oligo-mesotrophic conditions with minerogenic nutrient inputs from groundwater.


Main Description

  • A groundwater-fed northern aapa mire (peatland) undergoing restoration to rewet drained areas, enhance carbon sequestration, and restore natural hydrology and biodiversity.
  • Enhanced: Carbon sequestration and storage, water quality regulation, and flood moderation are significantly improved through ditch blocking and rewetting. Maintained: Fresh water provision, habitat support, and recreational values are restored and sustained.

Conserve Ecohydrological processes in natural ecosystem

YES

Enhance ecohydrological processes in novel ecosystem

NO

Apply complementary Ecohydrological processes in high impacted system

YES


This table presents the different categories of ecosystem services that ecosystem can provide, divided in:

Provisioning Services are ecosystem services that describe the material or energy outputs from ecosystems. They include food, water and other resources.

Fresh water: Ecosystems play a vital role in the global hydrological cycle, as they regulate the flow and purification of water. Vegetation and forests influence the quantity of water available locally.

Regulating Services are the services that ecosystems provide by acting as regulators eg. regulating the quality of air and soil or by providing flood and disease control.

Local climate and air quality: Trees provide shade whilst forests influence rainfall and water availability both locally and regionally. Trees or other plants also play an important role in regulating air quality by removing pollutants from the atmosphere.


Carbon sequestration and storage: Ecosystems regulate the global climate by storing and sequestering greenhouse gases. As trees and plants grow, they remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and effectively lock it away in their tissues. In this way forest ecosystems are carbon stores. Biodiversity also plays an important role by improving the capacity of ecosystems to adapt to the effects of climate change.


Erosion prevention and maintenance of soil fertility: Soil erosion is a key factor in the process of land degradation and desertification. Vegetation cover provides a vital regulating service by preventing soil erosion. Soil fertility is essential for plant growth and agriculture and well functioning ecosystems supply the soil with nutrients required to support plant growth.

Ecosystem services "that are necessary for the production of all other ecosystem services". These include services such as nutrient recycling, primary production and soil formation.

Habitats for species: Habitats provide everything that an individual plant or animal needs to survive: food; water; and shelter. Each ecosystem provides different habitats that can be essential for a species’ lifecycle. Migratory species including birds, fish, mammals and insects all depend upon different ecosystems during their movements.

Cultural Services corresponds nonmaterial benefits people obtain from ecosystems through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences.

Recreation and mental and physical health: Walking and playing sports in green space is not only a good form of physical exercise but also lets people relax. The role that green space plays in maintaining mental and physical health is increasingly being recognized, despite difficulties of measurement.


Aesthetic appreciation and inspiration for culture, art and design: Language, knowledge and the natural environment have been intimately related throughout human history. Biodiversity, ecosystems and natural landscapes have been the source of inspiration for much of our art, culture and increasingly for science.

Lifezones

Demosite Location
Life zone
Polar
Nival
Dry Tundra

Precipitation
PPT(mm/yr): 1.0

Temperature
T(ºc): 1.0

Elevation of demosite: meters above sea level
Humidity: Semiparched
PETr (by year):

EH Principles

Quantification of the hydrological processes at catchment scale and mapping the impacts

Distribution of ecosystems and their relevant processes (ex: metabolism=water and nutrient uptake and retention; biomass production)

Ecological engineering (integration, dual regulation and biotechnologies in catchment scale for enhancement of ecological potential)

ECOHYDROLOGY ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS

Ditch blocking and damming using peat and harvested tree biomass to rewet the peatland and restore natural water pathways.

Ecohydrological Infrastructure

egetation mapping and cluster analysis to guide restoration and monitor habitat recovery along moisture gradients.

Phytotechnology

Major Issues

  • Intensive land use: Historical forestry drainage in the 1960s-70s lowered water tables, enabling tree colonization and altering the natural peatland hydrology and vegetation
  • Habitat loss: Drainage caused substantial reduction of open fen habitats, degrading biodiversity and altering species composition, particularly reducing tall sedges like Carex lasiocarpa
  • Loss of retention capacity of vegetation: Increased evapotranspiration from post-drainage trees (Betula nana, Scots pine) disturbed the water balance, weakening the peatland's moisture retention and atmospheric regulation

Social ecohydrological system

EH Objectives

Water:
Biodiversity
Services
Resilience
Cultural Heritage

EH Methodology

  • Blocks drainage ditches and harvests post-drainage trees to raise water tables, reduce evapotranspiration, and reactivate natural peatland feedback mechanisms for carbon and water regulation


Catchment Ecohydrological sub-system

Objectives

  • Restore natural hydrology and raise water tables by blocking drainage ditches and harvesting trees

  • Enhance carbon sequestration and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the peatland

  • Rehabilitate open fen habitats to support native biodiversity and ecosystem services

  • Develop and demonstrate scalable ecohydrological methods for peatland restoration in the Baltic region

  • Stakeholders

  • University of Oulu

  • Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)

  • Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)

  • Finnish Forest Administration (Metsähallitus)

  • University of Latvia

  • Baltic Coasts

  • NABU

  • EthnoExpert

  • AMPHI

  • Reindeer Herders’ Association in Finland

  • EU and governmental representatives

  • LIFE PeatCarbon project consortium

  • Catchment Sociological sub-system

    Activities

    • Blocking and damming drainage ditches using peat and harvested tree biomass to rewet the peatland

    • Selectively harvesting post-drainage trees (Scots pine, Betula nana) to reduce evapotranspiration

    • Monitoring water tables with piezometers and groundwater flow with deep piezometers

    • Conducting geophysical surveys (GPR, seismic) to map peat stratigraphy and hydrology

    • Measuring carbon and energy fluxes using an eddy covariance tower

    • Analyzing microbial communities and greenhouse gas dynamics through seasonal sampling

    • Mapping vegetation and habitats to guide restoration and track recovery

    Expected Outcomes

    • Restore natural water table levels and hydrological connectivity across the peatland


    • Significantly increase carbon sequestration and reduce net greenhouse gas emissions


    • Reestablish open fen habitats and enhance native peatland biodiversity


    • Improve water quality by reducing nutrient and sediment runoff to downstream lakes


    • Develop replicable monitoring and modeling tools for peatland restoration success


    • Strengthen climate resilience and ecosystem self-regulation capacity


    • Provide a demonstration model for climate-smart peatland management in the boreal region


    Latest Results

    • Water tables began rising in autumn 2024 following ditch damming completion

    • Post-restoration undrained peatland carbon sink increased to 31 g C m⁻² period⁻¹ vs. drained area (19 g C m⁻² period⁻¹)

    • Pre-restoration drained forest was a stronger C sink (81 g C m⁻² period⁻¹) than undrained peatland (3 g C m⁻² period⁻¹)

    • Gross photosynthesis reduced in drained sector after tree harvest

    • Hydrological and GHG flux modeling accurately simulates ecosystem responses

    Contacts

    Omar Nimr

    • Omar.nimr@oulu.fi
    • University of Oulu, Finland

    Overview

    No democard yet.

    Back

      7, place de Fontenoy 75007 Paris - France

    Development: Copyright © 2015 CIH / All rights reserved. | Design: Copyright © 2012 Little NEKO / All rights reserved.